RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02220
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Code (RE) be changed so he can get back into
the Air Force and continue his service.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served his full term of service honorably and was given an
ineligible to re-enlist code due to Air Force cuts.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 13 Jun
06.
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment
Program Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air
Force Reserve, dated 1 Jun 12, his commander denied him
reenlistment because he was incapable of performing his duties
and unwilling to maintain high professional standards. The
applicant had behavioral history; he was permanently restricted
from carrying a weapon. He established a pattern of misconduct
consisting of failing to go to his appointed place of duty at
the time prescribed and being derelict in the performance of his
duties. He showed an unwillingness and inability to meet
required duty performance standards. He received seven Letters
of Reprimand (LOR) and five Letters of Counseling (LOC).
On 18 Jun 12, the commanders recommendation for denial of
reenlistment for the applicant was found to be legally
sufficient.
On 12 Jul 12, the applicant was discharged honorably, and was
credited with six years and one month of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the
USAF, states indicates commanders have selective reenlistment
selection or non-selection authority. The Selective
Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members Enlisted
Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from
any substantiated source, the airmans willingness to comply
with Air Force standards and/or the airmans ability (or lack
of) to meet required training and duty performance levels. The
applicant contends he received the RE code of 2X (first-term,
second term or career airman was considered by not selected for
reenlistment) because of Air Force cuts and seems to be under
the belief an honorable character of service corresponds to
being eligible to reenlist or reenter the military, which is not
the case. He was denied reenlistment under the SRP by his
commander for several infractions of standards that led to the
applicant receiving seven LORs and five LOCs. Accordingly, no
change to the applicants RE code is warranted.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02220 in Executive Session on 19 Mar 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02220 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 May 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 13 Jun 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the processing of his discharge. On 28 May 14, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code JBK which denotes Completion of Required Active Service be changed. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The raters comments state Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010. On 18 Feb 11, the applicants squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988
Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicants commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall 3 based upon the applicants failure to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04196
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04196 N COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to allow reentry in the military. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03836
However, his chain of command fabricated two additional LORs in order to involuntarily dismiss him from the military, and then denied his reenlistment in Mar 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...